Components Legal
statute-stack
Citation hierarchy — federal / state / local rows with citation, headline obligation, and status.
Use when three or four parallel jurisdictions need to read at a glance: each row carries the jurisdiction label, the citation, the obligation summary, and an effective-date marker.
When to use
- Three parallel jurisdictions. Federal / state / local — or any three peer regimes — that the room must hold side-by-side. The hue rotation cues which row is which without a legend.
- Citation plus obligation plus status. Each row is a three-part record: the citation (mono chip), the headline obligation in prose, the status pill. Use when all three matter; for citation-only, reach for list-tabular.
- Compliance briefings. Reach for statute-stack when the deck reads as a regulatory memo — counsel and operations need the same view of the same record at the same time.
When not to use
- More than four rows. The three-column rail collapses past four jurisdictions. For longer registers move to
lane(table form) or split across two statute-stack slides by topic. - Citation without obligation. Without the headline obligation sentence, the layout reads as a citation list. Use list-tabular spec when only the citation matters.
- Mixed entry shapes. Every row needs the same three parts — citation, obligation, status. A row missing the status pill or with prose instead of a citation breaks the visual contract.
Slots
| Slot | Selector | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
heading | h2 | yes | Slide heading framing what the three rows compare. |
rows | ul > li | yes | One li per jurisdiction. Lead with the jurisdiction label as a plain text first line; nested ul items carry the citation (inline code), obligation summary, and status (inline code). |
Anatomy
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ header │
│ Statute stack heading. │
│ │
│ ┌───────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ FEDERAL · cite [in effect] │ │
│ │ Obligation prose for tier. │ │
│ └───────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ ┌───────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ STATE · cite [pending] │ │
│ └───────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ footer 1/19 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘Variants
hierarchy — Authority pyramid
Stacks the rows vertically with descending row heights — Federal tallest, State mid, Local shortest. Use when the jurisdictions are nested in authority, not peers.
<!-- _class: statute-stack hierarchy -->
## Children's data — authority cascades downward.
- Federal
- `15 U.S.C. §6501 · COPPA`
- Verifiable parental consent for under-13 personal data.
- `In effect since 2000`
- State
- `Cal. Civ. Code §1798.120 · CCPA/CPRA`
- Opt-in for selling or sharing under-16 data; opt-out for over-16.
- `Enforced 2023`
- Local
- `NYC Admin Code §22-1201`
- Bias-audit obligation for AEDTs used in employment decisions.
- `Effective 2023` bands — Horizontal bands
Each jurisdiction becomes a full-width horizontal row with a label column on the left and the body inlined to the right. Use for compact compliance briefs where vertical real estate is tight.
<!-- _class: statute-stack bands -->
## Children's data — at-a-glance scorecard.
- Federal
- `15 U.S.C. §6501 · COPPA`
- Verifiable parental consent for under-13 personal data.
- `In effect since 2000`
- State
- `Cal. Civ. Code §1798.120 · CCPA/CPRA`
- Opt-in for selling or sharing under-16 data; opt-out for over-16.
- `Enforced 2023`
- Local
- `NYC Admin Code §22-1201`
- Bias-audit obligation for AEDTs used in employment decisions.
- `Effective 2023` preemption — Preemption cascade
Vertical stack with a downward arrow between each card. Use when the slide must show that the upper jurisdiction preempts or supersedes the one below.
<!-- _class: statute-stack preemption -->
## Federal preemption — how the cascade flows.
- Federal
- `15 U.S.C. §6501 · COPPA`
- Sets the floor for under-13 personal data collection.
- `Preempts conflicting state rules`
- State
- `Cal. Civ. Code §1798.120 · CCPA/CPRA`
- Stricter opt-in regime on top of COPPA's baseline.
- `Survives preemption`
- Local
- `NYC Admin Code §22-1201`
- Bias-audit obligation distinct from privacy preemption scope.
- `Independent of preemption` lane — Markdown table
Pivots to a markdown table — columns for jurisdiction, citation, obligation, status. Use for register-style briefings where the audience scans down each column.
<!-- _class: statute-stack lane -->
## Children's data — register view.
| Jurisdiction | Citation | Headline obligation | Status |
| ------------ | --------------------- | ------------------------- | ----------- |
| Federal | 15 U.S.C. §6501 | Parental consent <13 data | In effect |
| State | Cal. Civ. Code §1798 | Notice + opt-out + DSAR | Enforced |
| Local | NYC §22-1201 | Annual AEDT bias audit | Effective |